Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers · Florida

Orlando Branch

Orlando, FL · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orlando Branch runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Orlando Branch: 7.7 TCR = 350% of Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orlando Branch safety composite

Orlando Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Orlando Branch: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Orlando Branch's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 350% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #41/46
  • PHOTO Process Systems Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Process Systems Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Orlando Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orlando Branch averages 7.7 TCR (350% of the Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orlando Branch TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=15 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=16 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Orlando Branch falls in its industry

911 Industrial trucks, tractors, o establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 46 Industrial trucks, tractors, o employers in Florida.

Orlando Branch (28 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Orlando Branch
Orlando Branch (28 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Orlando Branch has fewer employees than the Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2021 12.8 12.8 4 0 0
2020 16.0 12.0 4 0 0
2019 8.7 4.4 2 0 0
2018 15.0 15.0 2 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · FL · Orlando

911 Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Process Systems Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NorthWest Handling Systems - Spokane 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 5 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JF Acquisitions, LLC d/b/a JF Petroleum Group: Charlotte, NC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rosana 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Nursery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harvesting 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ortiz Service Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Penn Presbyterian Medical Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Health Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Calhoun County Justice Complex 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wharton Tx 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southeastern Rubber Co., Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Diamond Products Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Penn Harris Madison Sch Corp 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03776 - WM of ME - Portland 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.