Filters, furnace, manufacturing · Florida

Orlando Distribution Center

Orlando, FL · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orlando Distribution Center runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Filters, furnace, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Orlando Distribution Center: 8.2 TCR = 250% of Filters, furnace, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orlando Distribution Center safety composite

Orlando Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Orlando Distribution Center injury rate improved

Orlando Distribution Center's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=17.3 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 250% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Phelps Fan LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phelps Fan LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Orlando Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orlando Distribution Center averages 8.2 TCR (250% of the Filters, furnace, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orlando Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=17.3 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Orlando Distribution Center falls in its industry

232 Filters, furnace, manufacturin establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Filters, furnace, manufacturin employers in Florida.

Orlando Distribution Center (31 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Orlando Distribution Center
Orlando Distribution Center (31 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Orlando Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Filters, furnace, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 11.9 8.9 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.8 3.9 1 1 0
2020 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2019 10.4 7.0 3 0 0
2018 17.3 13.8 5 0 0
2017 13.5 13.5 4 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · FL · Orlando

232 Filters, furnace, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phelps Fan LLC 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartzell Air Movement 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Research Products Corporation - Poynette 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Fans Abilene 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Ag LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wedgworth Farms, Inc Farms Shop 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fwest 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2406-Felda, FL 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Syracuse, NY 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaver Finishing 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Transpo Industries 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Flagstaff 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Building 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logan Township Distribution Center 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rainey Electronics, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kendall Construction, Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.