Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers · Florida

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks

Orlando, FL · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks: 1.6 TCR = 72% of Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks safety composite

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2023

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks injury rate improved

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/46
  • PHOTO MEI SYSTEM INC. WOOD…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEI SYSTEM INC. WOOD DALE ILLINOIS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks averages 1.6 TCR (72% of the Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks falls in its industry

911 Industrial trucks, tractors, o establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 46 Industrial trucks, tractors, o employers in Florida.

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks (36 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks
Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks (36 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Orlando Ring Power Lift Trucks has fewer employees than the Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · FL · Orlando

911 Industrial trucks, tractors, or trailers merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEI SYSTEM INC. WOOD DALE ILLINOIS 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wipro PARI Inc. Integration 1 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DISCO Hi-Tec America, Inc. OR 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briggs Equipment Fort Worth 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Citrus Management, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Alachua 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods Lake Wales Florida 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM4 Gladiolus Service Center 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Oxford NE 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Walla Walla Agronomy/C Store 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2960 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC.-063 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jones Exhaust Systems 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noble Fish 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations Building 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon Indy RDC OSHA 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.