Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Indiana

Orthopaedics Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~404 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orthopaedics Indianapolis runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Orthopaedics Indianapolis: 3.2 TCR = 84% of Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orthopaedics Indianapolis safety composite

Orthopaedics Indianapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Orthopaedics Indianapolis: 2.5 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Orthopaedics Indianapolis's TCR rose 2.3 from 2.5 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/58
  • PHOTO 45 Crossways Parks D…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~404 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 45 Crossways Parks Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Orthopaedics Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orthopaedics Indianapolis averages 3.2 TCR (84% of the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orthopaedics Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.7 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Orthopaedics Indianapolis falls in its industry

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 58 Orthopedic physicians' offices employers in Indiana.

Orthopaedics Indianapolis (404 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Orthopaedics Indianapolis
Orthopaedics Indianapolis (404 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Orthopaedics Indianapolis has more employees than the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., ce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 0.0 9 12 0
2022 4.7 0.5 12 7 0
2021 3.1 0.0 5 8 0
2020 1.8 1.0 5 2 0
2018 3.2 0.5 12 0 0
2017 2.4 1.1 8 1 0
2016 2.5 0.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · IN · Indianapolis

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 45 Crossways Parks Drive 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuba County Jail 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Center for Primary Care & Surg 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Husson Family Medicine 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2544 404 FTE
STATE-SIZE HRT Plymouth 405 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilkington North America 405 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5025 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Romark Logistics of Texas 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Sector Health Initiative 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Milan Transportation -Est 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Staffing/General Mills 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cedar Plant 404 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-FL 404 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owensboro Health Muhlenberg Community Hospital 404 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Island 404 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.