Pole (e.g., telephone) removal · Georgia

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA)

Atlanta, GA · ~124 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pole (e.g., telephone) removal workplace, earning a grade A.

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA): 0.5 TCR = 17% of Pole (e.g., telephone) removal BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) safety composite

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA): 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.9× in 2024

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA)'s TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #7/37
  • PHOTO TNT Crane & Rigging …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TNT Crane & Rigging - Houston Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Pole (e.g., telephone) removal BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) falls in its industry

1,634 Pole (e.g., telephone) removal establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 37 Pole (e.g., telephone) removal employers in Georgia.

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) (124 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA)
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) (124 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Atlanta (ATLGA) has more employees than the Pole (e.g., telephone) removal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.9 39 5 1
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · GA · Atlanta

1,634 Pole (e.g., telephone) removal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TNT Crane & Rigging - Houston Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Laurel Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR COR 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HydroChem LLC-TOK 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parrish Construction Group 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Comtran Group, INC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE AquaGuard Atlanta 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benning LRC 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Location 53035 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Snelson Companies, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hood Container New Johnsonville 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Justice Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baltimore Vehicle Preparation Center Mercedes Benz USA, LLC 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Monthan AFB 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE C03 Alexandria Care Center 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Bluffton 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.