Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Georgia

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.

Peachtree City, GA · ~3,608 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade A.

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 48% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. safety composite

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.: 1.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2021

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 1.0 in 2018 to 1.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Peachtree City, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #25/71
  • PHOTO Utility Division
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~3,608 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utility Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (48% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1 · 2021=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 71 Construction management, power employers in Georgia.

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. (3,608 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. (3,608 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.7 1.3 68 3 0
2018 1.0 0.8 26 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · GA · Peachtree City

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 83 employers in Peachtree City, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utility Division 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coutts Bros Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Pacific Energy Inc- CA- Salinas 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rsims Construction LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GA030 Atlanta - GP Center 3,567 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chamblee Campus 3,514 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. 3,773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Peachtree City (PTCGA) 4,488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Service, Inc. 3,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Lighting Peachtree City 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEACHTREE CITY DC GA 827 FTE
NAT-TCR Ogle County 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptargroup, Inc. - McHenry 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR White Construction LLC. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mocom Compounding 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ESPN Headquarters 3,607 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center 3,607 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Orlando Global Inovation (1044) 3,607 FTE
NAT-SIZE PIH Health Hospital - Whittier 3,609 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.