ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair · Maryland

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland

Lanham, MD · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair workplace, earning a grade A.

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland: 0.9 TCR = 31% of ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland safety composite

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland injury rate improved

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Lanham, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/26
  • PHOTO Clinton Construction
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clinton Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Otis Elevator Company-Maryland averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=2 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Otis Elevator Company-Maryland falls in its industry

1,138 ElevatorEscalator-Installation establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 26 ElevatorEscalator-Installation employers in Maryland.

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland (32 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Otis Elevator Company-Maryland
Otis Elevator Company-Maryland (32 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Otis Elevator Company-Maryland has fewer employees than the ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Moderniza median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MD · Lanham

1,138 ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 63 employers in Lanham, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clinton Construction 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES Power Contractors 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR D84 Honolulu 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Murphy Elevator Company 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hayes Construction Company 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Historic Restoration, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oliff Construction Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 319 Capitol Heights 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR JE Richards, Inc. 1,316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodmore 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Woodmore 040 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4813-48130009-FREEMAN EXPO LANHAM 299 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Roofing Corporation - Northglenn 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR J.K. Manufacturing Co. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Boeing Distribution Services Inc. - Coppell, TX 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Joiner Sheet Metal & Roofing Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bangor Bin 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Juan Pools-Az 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Concrete Designs Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers & Willard, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.