ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair · Nevada

Otis Elevator Company-Reno

Reno, NV · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Otis Elevator Company-Reno runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair workplace, earning a grade A.

Otis Elevator Company-Reno: 1.0 TCR = 34% of ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Otis Elevator Company-Reno safety composite

Otis Elevator Company-Reno scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2024

Otis Elevator Company-Reno injury rate improved

Otis Elevator Company-Reno's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Reno, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Raleigh
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Raleigh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Otis Elevator Company-Reno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Otis Elevator Company-Reno averages 1.0 TCR (34% of the ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Otis Elevator Company-Reno TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Otis Elevator Company-Reno falls in its industry

1,138 ElevatorEscalator-Installation establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 ElevatorEscalator-Installation employers in Nevada.

Otis Elevator Company-Reno (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Otis Elevator Company-Reno
Otis Elevator Company-Reno (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Otis Elevator Company-Reno has fewer employees than the ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Moderniza median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · NV · Reno

1,138 ElevatorEscalator-Installation,Modernization,Maintenance,Service,and Repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Raleigh 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Edison 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 241-Los Angeles 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 090-Jacksonville 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Planet 13 Production 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Nevada Precision Blasting 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGinness Hills Facility 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NV Energy-Elko 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Pensacola 22 Service Center Rd 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Denair HVAC INC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEWAS 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clayton NJ 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Calkins Electric Construction CO INC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Access Genetics 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joplin Residence Inn 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Se - Telford Truss 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.