Overhead door, residential-type, installation · Indiana

Overhead Door Company #661

Indianapolis, IN · ~117 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overhead Door Company #661 runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Overhead door, residential-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Overhead Door Company #661: 6.5 TCR = 234% of Overhead door, residential-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overhead Door Company #661 safety composite

Overhead Door Company #661 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2021

Overhead Door Company #661 injury rate improved

Overhead Door Company #661's TCR fell 0.7 from 6.2 in 2018 to 5.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238350 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 234% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Traemand Installatio…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Traemand Installation Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Overhead Door Company #661 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overhead Door Company #661 averages 6.5 TCR (234% of the Overhead door, residential-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overhead Door Company #661 TCR series: 2018=6.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=5.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Overhead Door Company #661 falls in its industry

367 Overhead door, residential-typ establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Overhead door, residential-typ employers in Indiana.

Overhead Door Company #661 (117 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Overhead Door Company #661
Overhead Door Company #661 (117 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Overhead Door Company #661 has more employees than the Overhead door, residential-type, install median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.6 5.6 7 0 0
2020 5.3 3.8 7 0 0
2019 9.2 5.6 13 0 0
2018 6.2 3.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238350 · IN · Indianapolis

367 Overhead door, residential-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Traemand Installation Services 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prescott Primera Carpet One 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR APCO BUILDING SPECIALTIES INC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHARLOTTE SALES CENTER 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pulaski County Egg Farm 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Plumbing & Heating Inc. 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Pallet 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-CSSD 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 231566-Centreville Po 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Care Home Health and Hospice 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jennings McCall Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colonial Press International 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kent, WA Office CS 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mark Center 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boker's, Inc. 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.