Garage door, residential-type, installation · Indiana

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation

Indianapolis, IN · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garage door, residential-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation: 6.2 TCR = 221% of Garage door, residential-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation safety composite

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation: 5.1 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2024

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation's TCR rose 3.4 from 5.1 in 2022 to 8.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238350 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 221% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO High Mountain Door &…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Mountain Door & Trim Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation averages 6.2 TCR (221% of the Garage door, residential-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation TCR series: 2022=5.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation falls in its industry

367 Garage door, residential-type, establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Garage door, residential-type, employers in Indiana.

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation (40 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation
Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation (40 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Insulation has fewer employees than the Garage door, residential-type, installat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 8.5 4 0 0
2023 4.9 3.3 3 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238350 · IN · Indianapolis

367 Garage door, residential-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Mountain Door & Trim Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holland's Custom Cabinets, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nelson Mill Company 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contra Costa Door Co. 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 320-NiSource-Chesterton IN-Bailly Gen 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baer Field Service Center 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE IND-DWH-INDIANA 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Wendel Trinkler Jr. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trade Access 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Insulation Northwest 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Chopper #400 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grade Line Construciton, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Policia Municipal 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryan Fireprotection of Ohio, LLC dba Cincinnati Dayton Fire Protection 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supercon Inc 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.