Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Pennsylvania

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh safety composite

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2023

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh injury rate improved

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/51
  • PHOTO Hennes Services, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hennes Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh falls in its industry

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or in establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 51 Garage door, commercial- or in employers in Pennsylvania.

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh (56 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh
Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh (56 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Overhead Door Company of Pittsburgh has more employees than the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · PA · Pittsburgh

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hennes Services, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2589_4904 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insulation Industries Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogue Mechanical Insulation 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Mt. Pleasant 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Chester Service Building 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ginger Hill 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infinity Custom Homes LP 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Global Washington Georgia Facility 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Phoenix 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gan Kavod at Sitrin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mirion Technologies (Canberra), Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Professional Associates, LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Island Precast, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Trench, Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sign Source USA 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.