Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing · California

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt

Compton, CA · ~125 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt safety composite

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2022→2024

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt injury rate improved

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.0 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324122 · Compton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO SOPREMA, Inc Wadswor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SOPREMA, Inc Wadsworth 310 Quadral (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt falls in its industry

148 Asphalt Shingle and Coating Ma establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Asphalt Shingle and Coating Ma employers in California.

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt (125 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt
Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt (125 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Owens Corning Compton Roofing & Asphalt has more employees than the Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324122 · CA · Compton

148 Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SOPREMA, Inc Wadsworth 310 Quadral 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CERTAINTEED LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tropical Roofing Products 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owens Corning Summit Roofing 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maywood Farms 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowland Vineyard Management, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventura Pacific 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Farms LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Geneseo 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sazerac Distillers, LLC d.b.a. The Glenmore Distillery 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnhardt Manufacturing Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3408 - Wall Township 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metairie Healthcare Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCF of Bowling Green, Inc. dba Bowling Green Manor 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #300 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.