Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc.

Bayside, NY · ~491 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc.: 10.0 TCR = 154% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. safety composite

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc.: 3.9 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.42× in 2024

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 3.9 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Bayside, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.0 · 154% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #469/616
  • PHOTO Pleasant View
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 210 inj
  • SIZE ~491 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pleasant View (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. averages 10.0 TCR (154% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=10.3 · 2020=22.2 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=14.3 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #469 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. (491 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc.
Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. (491 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ozanam Hall Of Queens Nursing Home Inc. has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 4.2 11 1 0
2023 7.2 6.0 19 0 0
2022 14.3 11.7 37 1 0
2021 14.3 12.4 39 0 0
2020 22.2 20.5 33 43 0
2018 10.3 9.5 40 0 0
2017 3.4 2.2 15 0 0
2016 3.9 2.5 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Bayside

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 21 employers in Bayside, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pleasant View 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springcreek Rehab and Nursing Center 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Terrace at Denison 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0004-Huntersville Oaks 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Estee Lauder - Research Park 491 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jewish Home Lifecare - Sarah Neuman Campus (The New Jewish Home) 491 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairmount 490 FTE
STATE-SIZE BUFFALO_1441030 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102580 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 2580 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAYSIDE CJ LLC 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR 352883-FLG-BAYSIDE CARRIER ANX 77 FTE
NAT-TCR Forward Technologies, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rwm Technologies, LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingman Police Department 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Lions Foundation 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Molecular Imaging - Hoffman Estates Facility 491 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missouri Cooperage 491 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerojet Rocketdyne - West Palm Beach 491 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 2 491 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.