Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) · Florida

P J Callaghan Construction

St Petersburg, FL · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P J Callaghan Construction runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade F.

P J Callaghan Construction: 7.5 TCR = 257% of Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P J Callaghan Construction safety composite

P J Callaghan Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2018→2023

P J Callaghan Construction injury rate improved

P J Callaghan Construction's TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.2 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · St Petersburg, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 257% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/26
  • PHOTO SHop
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SHop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

P J Callaghan Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P J Callaghan Construction averages 7.5 TCR (257% of the Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P J Callaghan Construction TCR series: 2018=8.2 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=7 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where P J Callaghan Construction falls in its industry

924 Construction management, indus establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 26 Construction management, indus employers in Florida.

P J Callaghan Construction (35 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate P J Callaghan Construction
P J Callaghan Construction (35 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

P J Callaghan Construction has fewer employees than the Construction management, industrial buil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.6 5.8 2 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2020 11.6 0.0 1 4 0
2019 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2018 8.2 8.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · FL · St Petersburg

924 Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 113 employers in St Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SHop 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Icon Protection Surprise 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA032 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Floats Inc. Timber Division 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ladybug Farms Inc 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flying W Cattle Company 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridge 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merritt Island Service Center 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adult Day Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Pinellas Care Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR South County Service Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resale Shoppe St Petersburg 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR EHSD, AVSD, BUSD, HZSD - San Diego 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Staten Island U Hosp South 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 21U2 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aquatic Co. Yelm 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westlake Compounds, LLC., Prairie 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE JTECH 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hill Wood Product 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Tankermen, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.