General merchandise, durable goods, merchant wholesalers · Kentucky

P3 Protective Packaging Products

Louisville, KY · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P3 Protective Packaging Products runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General merchandise, durable goods, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

P3 Protective Packaging Products: 4.0 TCR = 183% of General merchandise, durable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P3 Protective Packaging Products safety composite

P3 Protective Packaging Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

P3 Protective Packaging Products injury rate improved

P3 Protective Packaging Products's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.5 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.5 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423990 · Louisville, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO EB-LCOA-Le Creuset o…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EB-LCOA-Le Creuset of America/EB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

P3 Protective Packaging Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P3 Protective Packaging Products averages 4.0 TCR (183% of the General merchandise, durable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P3 Protective Packaging Products TCR series: 2022=4.5 · 2023=4 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 2.2

Where P3 Protective Packaging Products falls in its industry

322 General merchandise, durable g establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 General merchandise, durable g employers in Kentucky.

P3 Protective Packaging Products (27 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate P3 Protective Packaging Products
P3 Protective Packaging Products (27 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.0

P3 Protective Packaging Products has fewer employees than the General merchandise, durable goods, merc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423990 · KY · Louisville

322 General merchandise, durable goods, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EB-LCOA-Le Creuset of America/EB 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Headquarters 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORL 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Resources, Inc. 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Davis Tobacco 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robards Growout 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pikeville Transmission SC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Murray Natural Gas and Murray Water and Sewer System 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Dave's Fresh Marketplace of Airport Road 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 014 Western Plaza 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 034 Cayey 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sprint Environmental Services, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florentine Company 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 163514-Plymouth | CT | 163514 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Aurora Lodging Associates, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gezolan(KRAIBURG)LP 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.