Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics · North Carolina

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point

High Point, NC · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics workplace, earning a grade D.

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point: 5.0 TCR = 152% of Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point safety composite

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2019→2020

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point injury rate improved

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point's TCR fell 3.9 from 7.0 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.0 · 2020=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314120 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 152% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Basic Bedding Divisi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Basic Bedding Division-Martinsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point averages 5.0 TCR (152% of the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point TCR series: 2019=7 · 2020=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point falls in its industry

97 Cushions (except carpet, sprin establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Cushions (except carpet, sprin employers in North Carolina.

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point (51 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point
Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point (51 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Pacific Coast Feather Cushion - High Point has fewer employees than the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.0 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314120 · NC · High Point

97 Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Basic Bedding Division-Martinsville 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOWNLITE - MONROE 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HomTex, Inc. Corporate 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC-01 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hawksridge Farms, Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington Operations Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group North Carolina LLC - Charlotte Division 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE All other sites Gastonia 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Alexandria Shop 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : VPS - Destin-Fort Walton Beach 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Spurlock Power Station 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Koenig 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gadsden 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMG Demolition & Environmental Service 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 11958 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acoustical Solutions 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.