Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), manufacturing · California

Pacific Die Cut Industries

Hayward, CA · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Die Cut Industries runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pacific Die Cut Industries: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Die Cut Industries safety composite

Pacific Die Cut Industries scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pacific Die Cut Industries held a steady TCR band

Pacific Die Cut Industries's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Hayward, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO MAIN WK SH
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAIN WK SH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Die Cut Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Die Cut Industries averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Die Cut Industries TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Die Cut Industries falls in its industry

174 Dies, cutting (except metal cu establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Dies, cutting (except metal cu employers in California.

Pacific Die Cut Industries (28 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Die Cut Industries
Pacific Die Cut Industries (28 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Pacific Die Cut Industries has fewer employees than the Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · CA · Hayward

174 Dies, cutting (except metal cutting), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAIN WK SH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lenox Tools-Industrial Products 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Mfg. Co., LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaberg Industries IA 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Capitol Hill Nursing Center, LLC dba Capitol Hill Skilled Nursing and Therapy 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Project CU 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Perma R Products, Inc of MS 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Duke Glass Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE David W. White & Son, Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE SRS Crisafulli, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE John R. Hobbs Construction Co., Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shorewood Senior Living 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.