Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · California

Pacific Gold Marketing

Name: Pacific Gold Marketing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Fresno, CA · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.7
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Gold Marketing runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Pacific Gold Marketing: 0.7 TCR = 23% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Gold Marketing safety composite

Pacific Gold Marketing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Gold Marketing: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.11× in 2023

Pacific Gold Marketing's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 23% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK #18/147
PHOTO K-CO Enterprises, Inc.
BOOK 4y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K-CO Enterprises, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.7
K-CO Enterpris

0.7
Shelton Energy

0.7
BBC Electric

0.7
7102122 DUKE H

0.7

What this shows Pacific Gold Marketing averages 0.7 TCR (23% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Pacific Gold Marketing TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.2 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Pacific Gold Marketing falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 147 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in California.

Pacific Gold Marketing (95 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Pacific Gold Marketing has more employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	1.4	1.4	1
2019	1.2	1.2	1
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Fresno

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	K-CO Enterprises, Inc.	PIEDMONT, SC	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Shelton Energy Solutions, LLC	ALEXANDRIA, LA	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	BBC Electric	JOPLIN, MO	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	7102122 DUKE High Springs	HIGH SPRINGS, FL	0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Del Llano Farms	CASTROVILLE	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Los Altos Farms, LLC	AROMAS	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TreeSource	EXETER	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Costa View Farms 2 (Madera)	MADERA	95 FTE
CITY-NEAR	County of Fresno	Fresno	7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ag Force LLC	Fresno	6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Community Regional Medical Ctr	Fresno	5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Community Regional Medical Center	Fresno	4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR	BrandSafway Solutions, LLC - Atlanta Branch	Kennesaw, GA	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Litecrete, Inc	Miami, FL	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	WA006	Kent, WA	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Allied Power Services - Exelon, Byron Station	Byron, IL	0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Charlotte Container	Charlotte, NC	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Pelham Parkway Nursing Home	Pelham, GA	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Saugerties #193	Saugerties, NY	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Parker Health and Rehab	Parker City, IN	95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.