Metals service centers · Oregon

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company

Portland, OR · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company runs at 341% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company: 7.5 TCR = 341% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company safety composite

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2017→2022

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company injury rate improved

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company's TCR fell 4.3 from 9.6 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 341% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Ryerson-Elgin IL
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ryerson-Elgin IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company averages 7.5 TCR (341% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=5.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Metals service centers employers in Oregon.

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company (49 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company
Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company (49 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Pacific Machinery & Tool Steel Company has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.3 0.0 3 0 0
2021 7.2 1.8 4 0 0
2020 9.7 3.9 5 0 0
2019 7.6 1.9 4 0 0
2018 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2017 9.6 3.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · OR · Portland

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ryerson-Elgin IL 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRANCH 02 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Steel & Processing 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon Steel 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polehn Farms Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fessler Nursery Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIVERSAL SEED LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunnyview (Shared Services + MVS Admin + Warehouse) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR ProForm Fabrication, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SD Polymers LLC 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100564 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100530 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Bean & Produce 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. O. Smith Corporation, Apcom Protective Coatings Division 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darling International Inc 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waring 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.