Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), made from purchased paperboard · Oregon

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland

Portland, OR · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland safety composite

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland held a steady TCR band

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.1 in 2023 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.1 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK P57
  • PHOTO Greif (IP ROCK HILL)
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greif (IP ROCK HILL) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland TCR series: 2023=3.1 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland falls in its industry

140 Mailing cases and tubes, paper establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland (36 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland
Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland (36 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Pacific Paper Tube, Inc. - Portland has fewer employees than the Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · OR · Portland

140 Mailing cases and tubes, paper fiber (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greif (IP ROCK HILL) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tetra Pak Materials, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraustar 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraustar Arlington 407 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE FREDERICKSON FARMING LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4 B Farms, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snow Peak 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bend District Office 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Belleview Heights 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ici Manufacturing 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Current Hotel 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 747 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cerno LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miner - CDC Houston 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 185 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 060 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.