ALL printing operations including digital printing · California

Pacific Standard Print

Sacramento, CA · ~66 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Standard Print runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pacific Standard Print: 3.5 TCR = 107% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Standard Print safety composite

Pacific Standard Print scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2024

Pacific Standard Print injury rate improved

Pacific Standard Print's TCR fell 6.8 from 8.5 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.4 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #84/150
  • PHOTO Penmor Lithographers…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penmor Lithographers Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Standard Print in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Standard Print averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Standard Print TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.4 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Standard Print falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 150 ALL printing operations includ employers in California.

Pacific Standard Print (66 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Standard Print
Pacific Standard Print (66 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Pacific Standard Print has fewer employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 0 1 0
2022 4.4 4.4 0 3 0
2021 4.5 0.0 3 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 4.7 4 0 0
2016 8.5 7.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CA · Sacramento

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penmor Lithographers Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CL&D Graphics 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tursso Companies, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mossberg & Company, LLC 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Grand Rapids 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fond du Lac Container 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR K.M. Davies Co., Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Wasco County PUD 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aperion Care Midlothian 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE J-Lok Corp 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Elevator Company -Arcadia 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE De Jong Manufacturing, Inc. 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.