Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · South Carolina

Package Concepts & Materials,

Greenville, SC · ~86 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Package Concepts & Materials, runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Package Concepts & Materials,: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Package Concepts & Materials, safety composite

Package Concepts & Materials, scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Package Concepts & Materials,: 1.7 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Package Concepts & Materials,'s TCR rose 0.9 from 1.7 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Dazpak City of Indus…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dazpak City of Industry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Package Concepts & Materials, in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Package Concepts & Materials, averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Package Concepts & Materials, TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=5.1 · 2023=4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Package Concepts & Materials, falls in its industry

322 Bags, plastics film, single wa establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Bags, plastics film, single wa employers in South Carolina.

Package Concepts & Materials, (86 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Package Concepts & Materials,
Package Concepts & Materials, (86 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Package Concepts & Materials, has fewer employees than the Bags, plastics film, single wall or mult median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2023 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2021 5.1 3.1 5 0 0
2020 4.8 2.4 4 0 0
2018 8.1 3.5 6 1 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · SC · Greenville

322 Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dazpak City of Industry 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastic Packaging Technologies, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Bag - Ogden 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berry Global 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Short Term Establishments 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pickens Contracting, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paragon Sitework Constructors INC 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Fitch High School 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iqe North Carolina 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Janus of Santa Cruz 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MS Glass, LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blastech Mobile LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russell Landscape, LLC- Cobb 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elma 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.