Apparel folding and packaging services · Pennsylvania

packaging Coordinator

Philadelphia, PA · ~770 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

packaging Coordinator runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Apparel folding and packaging services workplace, earning a grade A.

packaging Coordinator: 0.7 TCR = 28% of Apparel folding and packaging services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

packaging Coordinator safety composite

packaging Coordinator scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2023

packaging Coordinator injury rate improved

packaging Coordinator's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.3 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #8/24
  • PHOTO Menasha Packaging Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~770 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menasha Packaging Company - Alsip (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

packaging Coordinator in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows packaging Coordinator averages 0.7 TCR (28% of the Apparel folding and packaging services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

packaging Coordinator TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 2.6

Where packaging Coordinator falls in its industry

228 Apparel folding and packaging establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 24 Apparel folding and packaging employers in Pennsylvania.

packaging Coordinator (770 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate packaging Coordinator
packaging Coordinator (770 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

packaging Coordinator has more employees than the Apparel folding and packaging services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.3 5 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 4 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 3 0 0
2019 0.7 0.6 5 0 0
2018 1.3 0.4 2 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · PA · Philadelphia

228 Apparel folding and packaging services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Alsip 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCI Pharma Services 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stronghaven DBA Packaging Unlimited 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific IN 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Philips 1740 Monroeville 771 FTE
STATE-SIZE Accredo Health Group, Inc. (Warrendale PA) 768 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station 767 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volvo Construction Equipment 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Caroline Street 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR One Technology Way, Norwood, MA. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Motion Systems : Goodland 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FireTron 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE NA-US-NY-Buffalo-Riverbend-South Park Ave 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE MIDATLANTIC 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE 323 Stinson 770 FTE
NAT-SIZE Myriad Genetics 770 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.