Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Maryland

Packaging Services of Maryland

Williamsport, MD · ~132 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Packaging Services of Maryland runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Packaging Services of Maryland: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Packaging Services of Maryland safety composite

Packaging Services of Maryland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Packaging Services of Maryland injury rate improved

Packaging Services of Maryland's TCR fell 0.5 from 5.7 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Williamsport, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO AGE San Benito Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AGE San Benito Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Packaging Services of Maryland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Packaging Services of Maryland averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Packaging Services of Maryland TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Packaging Services of Maryland falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Maryland.

Packaging Services of Maryland (132 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Packaging Services of Maryland
Packaging Services of Maryland (132 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Packaging Services of Maryland has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.4 5 1 0
2023 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2022 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2021 5.9 4.4 4 4 0
2020 3.1 2.4 4 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.8 2.3 5 0 0
2016 5.7 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MD · Williamsport

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 41 employers in Williamsport, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AGE San Benito Plant 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IA031 Dubuque Container 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dalton Box 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN025 Cleveland (TN) Container 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coakley Williams - Head Office 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Regional Rebar, Inc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAC Services 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-DC NE 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER EWP 556 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Potomac Edison Company 491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Potomac Edison 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR CertainTeed Corporation Williamsport Maryland 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Flagstaff 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Island Transportation Corp - Port Reading NJ 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Servco Auto Parts Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0745 Chapel Hill 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paragon 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matrix Tool Inc. 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.