Motor freight carrier, used household goods · Michigan

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb

Fraser, MI · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb runs at 409% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, used household goods workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb: 18.4 TCR = 409% of Motor freight carrier, used household goods BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb safety composite

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb: 3.5 → 24.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 31.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2022

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb's TCR rose 21.0 from 3.5 in 2016 to 24.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 31.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484210 · Fraser, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.4 · 409% of ind

  • DART 9.8 DART
  • RANK #29/37
  • PHOTO Thunderstealers LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thunderstealers LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb averages 18.4 TCR (409% of the Motor freight carrier, used household goods BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2018=13.7 · 2021=31.8 · 2022=24.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb falls in its industry

548 Motor freight carrier, used ho establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 37 Motor freight carrier, used ho employers in Michigan.

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb (31 employees, TCR 18.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb
Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb (31 employees, TCR 18.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6

Pacwell Inc. Dba Two Men and A Truck Macomb has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, used household go median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 24.5 9.8 5 0 0
2021 31.8 26.5 6 0 0
2018 13.7 10.3 4 0 0
2016 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484210 · MI · Fraser

548 Motor freight carrier, used household goods employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Fraser, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thunderstealers LLC 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Two Men and a Truck - Hopkins 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birdish. Inc. 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merchants Delivery Moving & Storage 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Greenhouse, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Production 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.B. Satkowiak's City Sewer Cleaners 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melching Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia - Fraser 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia Fraser 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 145 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Healthmark Industries Co. 287 FTE
NAT-TCR 180108-Albia Po 18.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Win Plastic Extrusions LLC 18.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Hampton Rescue Squad 18.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Thunderstealers LLC 18.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Steven KIA 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&M Masonry, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoner Industrial Services Main Branch 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Converting Division Houston), LLC 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.