OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS · Pennsylvania

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS workplace, earning a grade C.

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh: 3.1 TCR = 81% of OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh safety composite

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.3

2020→2023

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh injury rate improved

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh's TCR fell 12.3 from 12.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/39
  • PHOTO Brighter Heights Maine
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brighter Heights Maine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh averages 3.1 TCR (81% of the OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh TCR series: 2020=12.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh falls in its industry

611 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND S establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 39 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND S employers in Pennsylvania.

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh (24 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh
Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh (24 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Paens1-E15-Ensign I Pittsburgh has fewer employees than the OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE A median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 12.3 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · PA · Pittsburgh

611 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brighter Heights Maine 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerset 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Jasper Mountainside Manor GH 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaware County 240 Building 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Heights Mushrooms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynesburg PA 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric Power LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Higgins Electric Co. Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stoughton Lumber Company 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Myers Corporate 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Covercraft Industries - Aurora 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ganneston Construction Corp 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabkco-Aeg-Bakersfield Columbus 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 170th St - Jamaica 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greentree IRA - Medford 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.