Agriculture production or harvesting crews · Wisconsin

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC

Kewaunee, WI · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade F.

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC: 13.1 TCR = 291% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC safety composite

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.4

2016→2022

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC injury rate improved

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC's TCR fell 14.4 from 23.2 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 23.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.2 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=17.6 · 2019=15.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=18.7 · 2022=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Kewaunee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 291% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Fred Williams Trucki…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fred Williams Trucking, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC averages 13.1 TCR (291% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC TCR series: 2016=23.2 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=17.6 · 2019=15.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=18.7 · 2022=8.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Agriculture production or harv employers in Wisconsin.

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC (29 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC
Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC (29 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Pagel's Ponderosa Cropping LLC has fewer employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.8 4.4 2 0 0
2021 18.7 9.4 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 15.1 5.0 3 0 0
2018 17.6 4.4 4 0 0
2017 8.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 23.2 3.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · WI · Kewaunee

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 11 employers in Kewaunee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fred Williams Trucking, Inc 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kings River Harvesting, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JR Custom Harvesting Co., Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvest 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rhinelander Ag Research 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company - Millston 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Nursery Company, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Majestic View Dairy 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kewaunee Fabrications 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pagels Ponderosa Dairy LLC 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pagel's Ponderosa Dairy LLC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kewaunee Health Services 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Hunt Yachts 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Las Palmas 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0021-04272 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01123 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin's Counter Tops, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE vulcan enterprises, inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Construction Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE QC Powder, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.