Commercial building construction · Colorado

Palace Construction Co., Inc

Denver, CO · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Palace Construction Co., Inc runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Palace Construction Co., Inc: 4.8 TCR = 165% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Palace Construction Co., Inc safety composite

Palace Construction Co., Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Palace Construction Co., Inc: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Palace Construction Co., Inc's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 165% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #115/148
  • PHOTO Powerhouse Financial…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powerhouse Financial Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Palace Construction Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Palace Construction Co., Inc averages 4.8 TCR (165% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Palace Construction Co., Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=5.4 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Palace Construction Co., Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 148 Commercial building constructi employers in Colorado.

Palace Construction Co., Inc (89 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Palace Construction Co., Inc
Palace Construction Co., Inc (89 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Palace Construction Co., Inc has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2023 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2022 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2021 7.9 5.7 7 0 0
2020 8.3 6.3 8 0 0
2018 5.4 4.3 5 0 0
2017 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CO · Denver

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powerhouse Financial Services 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Art C. Klein Construction, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Tool Project Red Beacon 21080009 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FARMER BOY AG INC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lightsource bp - Denver Office 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poudre Valley Rural Electric Association, Inc 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Denver 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawrence Construction Company 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR DIT 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DRS Sustainments Systems, Inc- West Plains 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Duraloy Technologies Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bronson & Bratton, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Tech Systems, Inc. 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCAT Lubbock 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - TAC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICON Injection Molding, Inc. 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.