General warehousing and storage · Texas

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area)

Pasadena, TX · ~66 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area): 1.6 TCR = 28% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) safety composite

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) injury rate improved

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area)'s TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #234/846
  • PHOTO Colgate- Greenville,…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colgate- Greenville, SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) averages 1.6 TCR (28% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #234 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) (66 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area)
Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) (66 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 11 (Bay Area) has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 1 2 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Pasadena

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colgate- Greenville, SC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR STEMCELL Technologies USDC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lyons Warehouse 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becton Dickinson 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stratford Feedyard 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klesel 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE BP&L INDUSTRIES ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Chemical Company 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Refurbishment Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hildreth Electric 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford County Public Health - Wendover 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American & Efird Dyeing & Finishing Plant 15 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lathrop - BMD 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitestown 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Carolina QCC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE RLS Logistics Freight Consolidation 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.