General warehousing and storage · Texas

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston)

Houston, TX · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston): 10.1 TCR = 174% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) safety composite

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston): 3.7 → 16.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.63× in 2018

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston)'s TCR rose 12.8 from 3.7 in 2016 to 16.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.1 · 174% of ind

  • DART 16.5 DART
  • RANK #801/846
  • PHOTO Coke Northeast - Wat…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coke Northeast - Waterford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) averages 10.1 TCR (174% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2018=16.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #801 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) (25 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston)
Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) (25 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Palmer Logistics Warehouse 3 (Sam Houston) has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 16.5 16.5 2 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Houston

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coke Northeast - Waterford 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 86130B01 CVS PHARMACY, INC. 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 71041 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL5 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms of Monahans 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Feeders, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP 501-508 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Roswell Center (Garos) 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Renaissance Festival 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Fresh Seafood Sacramento 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #545 (Mobridge, SD) 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trig's Village Market 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Facility 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2957 Eugene Street 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBSHSEMI23 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.