Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Texas

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont

Beaumont, TX · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont runs at 357% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade F.

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont: 13.6 TCR = 357% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont safety composite

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1150.1

2016→2018

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont injury rate improved

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont's TCR fell 1150.1 from 1176.5 in 2016 to 26.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1176.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1176.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=26.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Beaumont, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 357% of ind

  • DART 13.2 DART
  • RANK #215/221
  • PHOTO Rehabilitation Hospi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rehabilitation Hospital of the Northwest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont averages 13.6 TCR (357% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont TCR series: 2016=1176.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=26.4 · BLS 3.8

Where PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #215 safest of 221 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Texas.

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont (134 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont
PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont (134 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Beaumont has fewer employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 26.4 13.2 4 0 0
2017 0.7 0.5 6 0 0
2016 1176.5 588.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Beaumont

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 329 employers in Beaumont, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rehabilitation Hospital of the Northwest 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma Rehabilitation Hospital 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Rehabilitation Hospital 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4073 Lancaster Rehab Hospital 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2362/1956-Lubbock, TX-Mfg (Monsanto Co.) 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Giddings Campus 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 111479-CHENIERE CC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tripoint Construction Services Incorporated 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas 2,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-1618 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR East Jordan Plastics, East Jordan Facility 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresno Fire Department 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Isle of Palms 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilderland 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Downers Grove, IL 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarksburg 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago CTC 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.X. Matt Brewing - Utica 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.