Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Texas

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake

Webster, TX · ~235 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake: 6.4 TCR = 168% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake safety composite

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−232.4

2016→2018

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake injury rate improved

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake's TCR fell 232.4 from 239.8 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 239.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=239.8 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Webster, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 168% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #149/221
  • PHOTO MercyOne Clive Rehab…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~235 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MercyOne Clive Rehabilitation Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake averages 6.4 TCR (168% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake TCR series: 2016=239.8 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 221 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Texas.

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake (235 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake
PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake (235 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake has more employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.4 7.4 5 0 0
2017 5.3 3.0 7 0 0
2016 239.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Webster

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 85 employers in Webster, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MercyOne Clive Rehabilitation Hospital 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Bowie 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CENTERRE HEALTHCARE CORPORATION 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Pensacola, Inc. (d/b/a Select Medical Rehabilitation - Pensacola) 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE D Courtney Construction 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEGACY SITE WORK, LLC 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Products Mont Belvieu TX 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE ExxonMobil BOP Baytown TX - BSL 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE CLEAR LAKE 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 1,918 FTE
CITY-NEAR abctree 1,449 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Professional Tree Services, Inc 1,333 FTE
NAT-TCR Waner Construction Colorado Headquarters 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Nebraska Medicine- Bellevue- E 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Denver (GH) 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Roy Way 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pam Specialty Hospital of Milwaukee 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maplewood 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stockyards Expressway 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US WA Woodland 1660 Heritage S (5281) 235 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.