CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services · Washington

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell

Bothell, WA · ~292 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell: 0.4 TCR = 84% of CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell safety composite

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell held a steady TCR band

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.6 in 2020 to 0.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Bothell, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Epsilon, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Epsilon, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell averages 0.4 TCR (84% of the CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell TCR series: 2020=0.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell falls in its industry

181 CAD (computer-aided design) sy establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 CAD (computer-aided design) sy employers in Washington.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell (292 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell
Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell (292 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Bothell has more employees than the CAD (computer-aided design) systems inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · WA · Bothell

181 CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 101 employers in Bothell, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Epsilon, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR King County Information Technology 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astreya Partners, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FR4 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellevue, WA 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE 701-00351 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE EvergreenHealth Monroe (DBA Valley General Hospital) 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Shoreline 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips Healthcare 2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips 1,495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips North America LLC 1,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Myers Squibb Cell Therapy Operations 610 FTE
NAT-TCR Baton Rouge - Pecue 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jerry Durant CBG, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Walbar Peabody LLC (Peabody MA) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR General Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seasons Retirement Community 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE D05 Manhattan Maint & Repair 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Interiors Inc 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherwood Construction Co. - Oklahoma City 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.