Administrative management services · New Jersey

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America

Newark, NJ · ~1,397 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administrative management services workplace, earning a grade A.

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America: 0.8 TCR = 33% of Administrative management services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America safety composite

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2017

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America injury rate improved

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · Newark, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO ASRC Construction Ho…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~1,397 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ASRC Construction Holding Company LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panasonic Corpoartion of North America averages 0.8 TCR (33% of the Administrative management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Panasonic Corpoartion of North America falls in its industry

544 Administrative management serv establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Administrative management serv employers in New Jersey.

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America (1,397 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Panasonic Corpoartion of North America
Panasonic Corpoartion of North America (1,397 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Panasonic Corpoartion of North America has more employees than the Administrative management services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.5 0.1 5 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · NJ · Newark

544 Administrative management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ASRC Construction Holding Company LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1737 Aiport Way 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tempe Desert View 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centra Business Center 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey City University 1,396 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riggs Distler & Company Inc 1,392 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJRAR - UPS TECHNOLOGY HEADQUARTERS DATACENTER 1,390 FTE
STATE-SIZE APM Terminals 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Schneider Electric - Middletown 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Mansfield 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JFSNA at NALCO Sugarland 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southaven MS - Reliant 90-17-12-11 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Valley Water District 1,397 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dba2 1,396 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downtown Bartlesville 1,396 FTE
NAT-SIZE Six Flags Over Texas 1,396 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.