Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) · California

Panorama City

Panorama City, CA · ~78 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panorama City runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) workplace, earning a grade F.

Panorama City: 9.7 TCR = 285% of Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panorama City safety composite

Panorama City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2024

Panorama City injury rate improved

Panorama City's TCR fell 1.4 from 13.4 in 2017 to 12.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.4 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=12.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 452990 · Panorama City, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 285% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #232/255
  • PHOTO 2054
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2054 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Panorama City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panorama City averages 9.7 TCR (285% of the Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panorama City TCR series: 2017=13.4 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=10 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=12 · BLS 3.4

Where Panorama City falls in its industry

2,120 Catalog showrooms, general mer establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #232 safest of 255 Catalog showrooms, general mer employers in California.

Panorama City (78 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Panorama City
Panorama City (78 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Panorama City has more employees than the Catalog showrooms, general merchandise ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.0 5.2 7 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 10.0 5.0 6 0 0
2021 16.7 3.3 10 0 0
2020 11.6 8.3 7 0 0
2019 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2018 9.3 0.0 7 0 0
2017 13.4 5.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

452990 · CA · Panorama City

2,120 Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 30 employers in Panorama City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2054 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #4576 Machesney Park, 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #4761 Paris, TX 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #5480 Chester, SC 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Endive Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Napa 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Harris Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hadley Date Gardens, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08880851 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER 1,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08180851 953 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08680851 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08680851 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Crossfield Heating & AC, Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MediLodge At The Shore 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OKO006 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR National Management Resources Reinhardt University 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metals USA - Gregor Technologies 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharon Healthcare Woods 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nathan Hale School 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prestige Drywall inc. 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.