Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry

Mars, PA · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry: 7.4 TCR = 196% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry safety composite

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−57.5

2020→2022

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry injury rate improved

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry's TCR fell 57.5 from 70.0 in 2020 to 12.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 70.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=70.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mars, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 196% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #118/233
  • PHOTO Prairie House
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry averages 7.4 TCR (196% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry TCR series: 2020=70 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry (52 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry
Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry (52 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Paramount Senior Living at Cranberry has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.4 12.4 5 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 70.0 67.2 9 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Mars

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 25 employers in Mars, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prairie House 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF LEBANON PA 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10344 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SV-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR SEVERNA PARK 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vogel Disposal Company, Inc.. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Austin Company 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHY Family Services 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Jewish Senior Life 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03170 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Doctor Fix It 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0023-02482 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waters of Robertson 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lamar Court Assisted Living 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deburring House Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avnet Hoffman Estates USXH 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.