Home care of elderly, non-medical · California

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc.

Laguna Hills, CA · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Home care of elderly, non-medical workplace, earning a grade B.

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 51% of Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. safety composite

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Laguna Hills, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/230
  • PHOTO PSC Shandon
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSC Shandon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (51% of the Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. falls in its industry

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medi establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 230 Home care of elderly, non-medi employers in California.

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc.
Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Parentis Home Care Providers, Inc. has fewer employees than the Home care of elderly, non-medical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.6 11.6 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Laguna Hills

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 56 employers in Laguna Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSC Shandon 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADD, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Farm Solutions LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Life Lehigh Valley, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMM00 SADDLEBACK MEMORIAL MED CENTER 1,752 FTE
CITY-NEAR RbA Orange County 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moulton Niguel Water District 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Laguna Hills 529 152 FTE
NAT-TCR 4765-HNLPW9743 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Sanctuary Golf Course 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Choice Roofing Southeast LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Metal Fabricating Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ALD Precast Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City, MO Call Ctr 90-40-18-12 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Precision Products 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rbco 18 Sc-Mdatl 90-18-01-90 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.