DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist

Roseville, MN · ~1,141 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist: 4.4 TCR = 117% of DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist safety composite

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist: 3.7 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.12× in 2019

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist's TCR rose 1.4 from 3.7 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621210 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 117% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #18/29
  • PHOTO Dental Associates Fa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~1,141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dental Associates Family & Specialty Care LLC - Appleton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Dental/The Dental Specialist averages 4.4 TCR (117% of the DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Park Dental/The Dental Specialist falls in its industry

81 DDSs' (doctors of dental surge establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 29 DDSs' (doctors of dental surge employers in Minnesota.

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist (1,141 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Dental/The Dental Specialist
Park Dental/The Dental Specialist (1,141 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Park Dental/The Dental Specialist has more employees than the DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) office median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.1 0.5 50 0 0
2018 3.7 0.4 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621210 · MN · Roseville

81 DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dental Associates Family & Specialty Care LLC - Appleton 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller Park Way 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Dentists 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge Family Dental 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2272-22720180 1,144 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN102 EDEN PRAIRIE-11020 OPTUM CIR 1,145 FTE
STATE-SIZE MRCI-Premier Drive 1,149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donaldson Company - Bloomington, MN 1,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville 488 FTE
NAT-TCR Canterfield of Oak Ridge, LLP 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Zone - Youngstown, OH 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion Tin Can Plant 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 154 ABC Supply Co., Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glenbard Dist 87 1,141 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRT-ODFL 1,141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lozier Corporation - Omaha 1,141 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW9 1,140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.