Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings · California

Park Newport Apartments

Newport Beach, CA · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Newport Apartments runs at 445% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings workplace, earning a grade F.

Park Newport Apartments: 6.2 TCR = 445% of Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Newport Apartments safety composite

Park Newport Apartments scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2021

Park Newport Apartments injury rate improved

Park Newport Apartments's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=16.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Newport Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 445% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #73/113
  • PHOTO Related Management C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Related Management Company LP The Caledonia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Park Newport Apartments in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Newport Apartments averages 6.2 TCR (445% of the Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Newport Apartments TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7 · 2020=16.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Park Newport Apartments falls in its industry

1,100 Lessors of Residential Buildin establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 113 Lessors of Residential Buildin employers in California.

Park Newport Apartments (37 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Newport Apartments
Park Newport Apartments (37 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Park Newport Apartments has fewer employees than the Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwe median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 16.5 12.3 4 0 0
2019 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · CA · Newport Beach

1,100 Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 106 employers in Newport Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Related Management Company LP The Caledonia 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Throggs Neck 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butler 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Club at Brookfield Hills 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 8,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoag Hospital 5,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian - Irvine 2,615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Irvine Company Resorts Division 2,175 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Providence College-Raymond 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanderson Farms Laurel Hatchery 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Holden Heights 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR A.W. Farrell & Son - Dunkirk Office 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE RM Edgewood 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTPS - Industry 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbortown Clinic 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northland Park Dialysis 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.