Retirement communities, continuing care · Tennessee

Park Place Retirement

Hendersonville, TN · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Place Retirement runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Park Place Retirement: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Place Retirement safety composite

Park Place Retirement scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2017→2024

Park Place Retirement injury rate improved

Park Place Retirement's TCR fell 4.5 from 8.6 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hendersonville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #46/100
  • PHOTO Brookdale Northwest …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Northwest Hills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Park Place Retirement in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Place Retirement averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Place Retirement TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Park Place Retirement falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 100 Retirement communities, contin employers in Tennessee.

Park Place Retirement (49 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Place Retirement
Park Place Retirement (49 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Park Place Retirement has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2023 8.3 8.3 4 0 0
2022 12.5 7.5 4 1 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 6.7 2.3 1 2 0
2018 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2017 8.6 5.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Hendersonville

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 82 employers in Hendersonville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Northwest Hills 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Potomac 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Sarasota 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villages of Wilkes Traditional Living 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE THOMAS BUILDERS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carter Group, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sain Construction Co. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Hendersonville Medical Center 734 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendersonville Medical Center 567 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Hendersonville 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Hendersonville, TN 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Crystal Lake LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellington Energy, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR L.P. Company Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 34 Oaks Fine Cabinetry LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE K-2 Industries, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE RS Microwave Co., Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cole Century Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compton 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.