Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Park Ridge Living Center

Rochester, NY · ~246 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Ridge Living Center runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Park Ridge Living Center: 10.5 TCR = 162% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Ridge Living Center safety composite

Park Ridge Living Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−56.4

2016→2024

Park Ridge Living Center injury rate improved

Park Ridge Living Center's TCR fell 56.4 from 59.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 59.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=59.4 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=40.1 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.5 · 162% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #475/616
  • PHOTO Crossroads Care Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~246 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crossroads Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Park Ridge Living Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Ridge Living Center averages 10.5 TCR (162% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Ridge Living Center TCR series: 2016=59.4 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=40.1 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3 · BLS 6.5

Where Park Ridge Living Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #475 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Park Ridge Living Center (246 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Ridge Living Center
Park Ridge Living Center (246 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Park Ridge Living Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.4 5 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 7 0 0
2022 10.2 9.5 16 0 0
2021 7.2 6.6 12 0 0
2020 40.1 40.1 10 0 0
2019 6.6 5.4 16 0 0
2018 7.9 6.7 20 0 0
2017 4.9 4.5 14 0 0
2016 59.4 59.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Rochester

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crossroads Care Center 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEATHER HILLS RETIREMENT VILLAGE 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Villa Health Care 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoneridge Creek Pleasanton 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petersburgh 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aptar 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velocity-Outdoor, Crosman 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE 374 - Levittown 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Erdman Machine Co. 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Joe Daniels Construction Co., Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ERI Holliston, MA 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR FV American Dynasty 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE To-Jo Mushrooms Inc. 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preformed Line Products 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Troy 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE IKEA #462 Las Vegas 246 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.