Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Parsons House Austin

Austin, TX · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parsons House Austin runs at 469% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Parsons House Austin: 17.8 TCR = 469% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parsons House Austin safety composite

Parsons House Austin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.8

2018→2023

Parsons House Austin injury rate improved

Parsons House Austin's TCR fell 14.8 from 24.0 in 2018 to 9.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 37.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=24.0 · 2019=37.5 · 2020=26.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 469% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #450/470
  • PHOTO Bethany Retirement H…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bethany Retirement Home, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Parsons House Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parsons House Austin averages 17.8 TCR (469% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parsons House Austin TCR series: 2018=24 · 2019=37.5 · 2020=26.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=8 · 2023=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Parsons House Austin falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #450 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Parsons House Austin (52 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Parsons House Austin
Parsons House Austin (52 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Parsons House Austin has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.2 3.0 3 0 0
2022 8.0 5.3 3 0 0
2021 1.9 0.2 7 2 0
2020 26.4 14.2 10 3 0
2019 37.5 15.8 17 2 0
2018 24.0 7.4 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Austin

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bethany Retirement Home, Inc. 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Meadows 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shores at Clear Lake 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Hills Somerset 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE KR SGHS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feeders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hale Center Feedyard 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idalou Egg Ranch LP 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Yummy.com PV 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 141 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sapphire Nursing and Rehab at Goshen 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Boose Aluminum Foundry Co 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE North 40 Outfitters #9 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villas of Holly Brook - Pekin 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntngtn Pk Base - Bld: 0253 - 15 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Tool, Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.