Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Parsons House Preston Hollow

Dallas, TX · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parsons House Preston Hollow runs at 467% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Parsons House Preston Hollow: 17.8 TCR = 467% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parsons House Preston Hollow safety composite

Parsons House Preston Hollow scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2019→2023

Parsons House Preston Hollow injury rate improved

Parsons House Preston Hollow's TCR fell 12.5 from 19.7 in 2019 to 7.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=19.7 · 2020=26.3 · 2023=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 467% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #449/470
  • PHOTO MCAP Manassas LLC d/…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCAP Manassas LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Manassas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Parsons House Preston Hollow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parsons House Preston Hollow averages 17.8 TCR (467% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parsons House Preston Hollow TCR series: 2019=19.7 · 2020=26.3 · 2023=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Parsons House Preston Hollow falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #449 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Parsons House Preston Hollow (39 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Parsons House Preston Hollow
Parsons House Preston Hollow (39 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Parsons House Preston Hollow has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2020 26.3 23.6 3 7 0
2019 19.7 11.3 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Dallas

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCAP Manassas LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Manassas 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Shiloh 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY MYSTIC OPERATION LLC 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10064 17.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dumas 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy - Wink TX 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAR SOUTH MINING LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Iroquois Nursing Home Inc 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 147 Camelback 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Farms - 018 - BF La Cumbre 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Peak Resources Brookshire 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kwik Fill M299/299 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oil Equipment Co., Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimmermann Printing Company 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reflections Memory Care - Morton 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.