Magnesium compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · Texas

Pasadena Catalyst

Pasadena, TX · ~115 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pasadena Catalyst runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Magnesium compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pasadena Catalyst: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Magnesium compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pasadena Catalyst safety composite

Pasadena Catalyst scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pasadena Catalyst: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2024

Pasadena Catalyst's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #16/47
  • PHOTO Bio Lab, Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bio Lab, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pasadena Catalyst in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pasadena Catalyst averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Magnesium compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pasadena Catalyst TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Pasadena Catalyst falls in its industry

418 Magnesium compounds, not speci establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 47 Magnesium compounds, not speci employers in Texas.

Pasadena Catalyst (115 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pasadena Catalyst
Pasadena Catalyst (115 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Pasadena Catalyst has more employees than the Magnesium compounds, not specified elsew median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · TX · Pasadena

418 Magnesium compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bio Lab, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascensus Specialties - Elma Plant 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chemtrade Refinery Services Inc. Tulsa 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellLA25 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters - Houston 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cypress Service Center CP10 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernard Electric Cooperative, Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE GVEC Western Operations Center 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR Harvey, IL - 16100 Lathrop Avenue 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Films Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR American Friction Technologies 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR X34 Med - Wilsonville 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE AWI Coldwater Warehouse 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Joist West 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincolnton Rehabilitation Center 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiaCom Corporation 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.