Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Ohio

Patheon - Reading Road

Cincinnati, OH · ~809 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Patheon - Reading Road runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Patheon - Reading Road: 1.6 TCR = 50% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Patheon - Reading Road safety composite

Patheon - Reading Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Patheon - Reading Road held a steady TCR band

Patheon - Reading Road's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #17/26
  • PHOTO CEL-SCI Corp -San To…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~809 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CEL-SCI Corp -San Tomas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Patheon - Reading Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Patheon - Reading Road averages 1.6 TCR (50% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Patheon - Reading Road TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Patheon - Reading Road falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 26 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Ohio.

Patheon - Reading Road (809 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Patheon - Reading Road
Patheon - Reading Road (809 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Patheon - Reading Road has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.9 1.4 15 1 0
2020 1.4 0.9 12 0 0
2016 1.7 0.8 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · OH · Cincinnati

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CEL-SCI Corp -San Tomas 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR West-Ward Cherry Hill 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9001 Torresdale Ave 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAPS Dallas 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nestle Prepared Foods 810 FTE
STATE-SIZE OH_Columbus_1015 Olentangy River Rd._TWCMOH38 808 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3 Cincinnati Electronics 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE New River Electrical Corp - Granville 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Carthage, MO 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D&G Sheet Metal Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage of Brookstone 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Payne Mechanical Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wake Forest Health Network 809 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flvle - Jacksonville Hib 809 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 809 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Int. Airport 809 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.