Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing · Texas

Patton Cabinet Doors

Austin, TX · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Patton Cabinet Doors runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Patton Cabinet Doors: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Patton Cabinet Doors safety composite

Patton Cabinet Doors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2017→2021

Patton Cabinet Doors injury rate improved

Patton Cabinet Doors's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337110 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/48
  • PHOTO Elkay Wood Products …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elkay Wood Products - Waconia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Patton Cabinet Doors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Patton Cabinet Doors averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Patton Cabinet Doors TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Patton Cabinet Doors falls in its industry

508 Bathroom vanities (except free establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 48 Bathroom vanities (except free employers in Texas.

Patton Cabinet Doors (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Patton Cabinet Doors
Patton Cabinet Doors (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Patton Cabinet Doors has fewer employees than the Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2017 5.3 2.7 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337110 · TX · Austin

508 Bathroom vanities (except freestanding), stock or custom wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elkay Wood Products - Waconia 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEM Associates LLC (DBA Prevo Cabinetry) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Woodmark Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fabuwood Cabinetry Corp. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Fenton Rigging and Contracting, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Creation Technologies Chicago BU 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rinker INDCP2 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cafe Patachou River Crossing 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh, PA HVAC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferrari of New England & Boch Maserati 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Double M Carriers Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regional West Village 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.