Distribution of electric power · Ohio

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative

Paulding, OH · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative: 2.4 TCR = 203% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative safety composite

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative: 0.0 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.72× in 2023

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 11.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 4.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Paulding, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.4 · 203% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #84/120
  • PHOTO Southern Indiana Power
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southern Indiana Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative averages 2.4 TCR (203% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=11.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 120 Distribution of electric power employers in Ohio.

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative
Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Paulding Putnam Electric Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · OH · Paulding

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 12 employers in Paulding, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southern Indiana Power 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davenport Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Galesburg 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insource Technologies 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alex Products, Inc. - Paulding Plant 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR NASG Seating Paulding, LLC 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartech LLC - Paulding 110 FTE
NAT-TCR Ihop 1523 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Foertsch Group 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander's Mobility Services - Dallas 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Endura Products Inc, Lower Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beacon Recycling, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ihop 3235 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ihop 3085 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ihop 3052 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.