Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Missouri

Paulo - St. Louis

St. Louis, MO · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paulo - St. Louis runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Paulo - St. Louis: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paulo - St. Louis safety composite

Paulo - St. Louis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2024

Paulo - St. Louis injury rate improved

Paulo - St. Louis's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.3 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Paulo - Murfreesboro
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paulo - Murfreesboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Paulo - St. Louis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paulo - St. Louis averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paulo - St. Louis TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=9 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.3 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Paulo - St. Louis falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Missouri.

Paulo - St. Louis (61 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Paulo - St. Louis
Paulo - St. Louis (61 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Paulo - St. Louis has more employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.2 7.5 6 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.8 4.4 3 1 0
2018 9.0 7.7 7 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.2 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MO · St. Louis

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paulo - Murfreesboro 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Steel Treating, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atmosphere Annealing Canton 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THERMOFUSION INC 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BCCM Construction Group 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Industrial Services 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donelson Construction Company, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA-PDS-PACIFIC MO 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Clare Meadows Care Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sowards Glass, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR XLF 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Landcare Landscaping 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Helena Service Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimtech 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2 Park Avenue 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE XWK 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.