Scholastic magazines and periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing · Tennessee

Paulsen Printing Company

Memphis, TN · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paulsen Printing Company runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scholastic magazines and periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing workplace, earning a grade D.

Paulsen Printing Company: 5.5 TCR = 167% of Scholastic magazines and periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paulsen Printing Company safety composite

Paulsen Printing Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2020→2024

Paulsen Printing Company injury rate improved

Paulsen Printing Company's TCR fell 3.6 from 8.6 in 2020 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=8.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Memphis, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/52
  • PHOTO Ad Tape & Label Co.,…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ad Tape & Label Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Paulsen Printing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paulsen Printing Company averages 5.5 TCR (167% of the Scholastic magazines and periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paulsen Printing Company TCR series: 2020=8.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Paulsen Printing Company falls in its industry

2,001 Scholastic magazines and perio establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 52 Scholastic magazines and perio employers in Tennessee.

Paulsen Printing Company (38 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Paulsen Printing Company
Paulsen Printing Company (38 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Paulsen Printing Company has fewer employees than the Scholastic magazines and periodicals com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2020 8.6 5.7 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · TN · Memphis

2,001 Scholastic magazines and periodicals commercial printing (except screen) without publishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ad Tape & Label Co., Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NIEMAN PRINTING, INC. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ross Printing, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Printing Arts 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Memphis 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Nashville 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.A. Fielden Co, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Knoxville, TN 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0667 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fareway Stores, Inc. 102 Fairmont 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nebraska Harvest Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. - Chatsworth Receiving 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit GI 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Foodservice-South Florida 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Plant 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Carpet Cleaning 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.