Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Ohio

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop

Cincinnati, OH · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop safety composite

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop's TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2023 to 6.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO LexTM3 - Florida
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LexTM3 - Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Ohio.

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop (75 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop
PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop (75 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

PCB Piezotronics / The Modal Shop has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 2.2 2 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · OH · Cincinnati

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LexTM3 - Florida 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 173 FACN - GREENSBORO 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex Connectors LLC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA84 INTERCONNECTS - HERMETIC SEAL 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bardshar Wholesale 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Service Center 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Midwest (Columbus) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirk Bros Co, Inc. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Johnston Industries Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Guardian CSC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St Joseph Service Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Milkco, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paul Durham Electric Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocala 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cajog - San Jose Gateway 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nyall - Olean Center 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.